Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsAUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

AUDI Q5 III (GU)

2.0 TFSI

268 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,675 kg
    3,693 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI

  • Most powerful
    268 hp
    200 kW
  • Best estimated range
    691 km
    430 mi
  • Largest trunk
    782 L
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSIAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
265hp198kW
268hp200kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,675kg3,693lb
1,925kg4,244lb
Gross weight
2,290kg5,049lb
-
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
69.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
31.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
691km430mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,717mm186in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,900mm75in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,669mm66in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,817mm111in
Front track
1,590mm63in
-
Rear track
1,580mm62in
-
Trunk volume
540L
782L
Max trunk volume-
1,611L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
65L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSIAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
31.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
268 hp
200 kW

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has 3 hp more than Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
1,925 kg
4,244 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
243 km/h
151 mph
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI5.9 s
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI6.2 s

Although AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has more power, Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
682 km
424 mi
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
691 km
430 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
268 hp
200 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
268 hp
200 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
782 L
27.6 cu ft
Length
4,717 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,669 mm
65.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
268 hp
200 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
5.9 s
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSIAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
268 hp
200 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.2 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,675 kg
3,693 lb
1,925 kg
4,244 lb
Fuel consumption
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
782 L
27.6 cu ft
Length
4,717 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,669 mm
65.7 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
691 km
430 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
782 L
27.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSIAUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
Consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.40 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.78 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,310 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Is 250 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 10 km (6 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 242 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
50 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 T4
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
2.0 TFSI
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202350 TDI V6
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster