Cupra Terramar
Car comparison
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsPorsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2021 T 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2021
T 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,675 kg3,693 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0
- Best estimated range739 km459 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,865kg4,112lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,510kg5,534lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 75.1s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 27.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,726mm186in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,927mm76in |
| Height | 1,586mm62in | 1,606mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 187mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 458L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,503L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 27.6 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 5.9 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 682 km 424 mi |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 739 km 459 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 458 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI | Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 82 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2021 T 2.0
- Has 57 km (35 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























