Car comparison

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsLynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Formentor

2.0 TSI

245 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS

Lynk & Co 09

EM-P 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,481 kg
    3,265 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    165 hp/t
    123 kW/t
    6.0 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.0 L/100 km
    247.6 mpg US
    297.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    7,368 km
    4,579 mi
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraFormentor2.0 TSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
245hp183kW
254hp189kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,481kg3,265lb
2,470kg5,445lb
Gross weight
2,060kg4,542lb
-
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
71.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
81.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
25.9s
Calculated
29.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
1L/100 km247.6mpg US297.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
142Nm/t95lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
633km393mi
Calculated
7,368km4,579mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,450mm175in
5,042mm199in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,977mm78in
Height
1,528mm60in
1,780mm70in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,680mm66in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,684mm66in
Ground clearance-
190mm7in
Trunk volume
450L
264L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
6
Fuel tank
50L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSILynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5PowerTorque
  • Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI5,250-6,500 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm6,750 rpm
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraFormentor2.0 TSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.9 s
29.2 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
157 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 has 9 hp more than Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
1,481 kg
3,265 lb
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
2,470 kg
5,445 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
238 km/h
148 mph
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI6.8 s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T55.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 7.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
633 km
393 mi
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
7,368 km
4,579 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
6.8 s
238 km/h
148 mph
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
5.9 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
6.8 s
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraFormentor2.0 TSILynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5
Power
245 hp
183 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
5.9 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,481 kg
3,265 lb
2,470 kg
5,445 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
1.0 L/100 km
247.6 mpg US
297.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
5,042 mm
198.5 in
Height
1,780 mm
70.1 in
Range score
633 km
393 mi
7,368 km
4,579 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Formentor 2.0 TSILynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK1 L/100 km247.6 mpg US297.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km1.66 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi2.68 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal143 L38 US gal31 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year249.38 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 989 kg lighter
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 186 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 7.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6,736 km (4,185 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
T 2.0
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 2021T 2.0
EM-P 2.0TD T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
EM-P 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0i
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 TSI
GLA 250
VS
CupraFormentor2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250
EM-P 2.0TD T5
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co09EM-P 2.0TD T5vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI vs Lynk & Co 09 EM-P 2.0TD T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster