Car comparison

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Mazda CX-60

2.5 e-Skyactiv

192 hp2488 ccHybridAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    212 km/h
    132 mph
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,505 kg
    3,318 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    485 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.5 L/100 km
    156.8 mpg US
    188.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    3,333 km
    2,071 mi
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
190hp142kW
192hp143kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
261Nm193lb-ft
Curb weight
1,505kg3,318lb
2,072kg4,568lb
Gross weight
2,090kg4,608lb
2,667kg5,880lb
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
70.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
64.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
40.8s
Calculated
38.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
655km407mi
Calculated
3,333km2,071mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,488cc152cu in
Length
4,381mm172in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,625mm64in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,572mm62in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,544mm61in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
485L
477L
Max trunk volume-
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIMazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivPowerTorque
  • Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv6,000 rpm-6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.8 s
38.7 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv has 2 hp more than Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
261 Nm
193 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
2,072 kg
4,568 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
212 km/h
132 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI7.2 s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv5.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 6.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
655 km
407 mi
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
3,333 km
2,071 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
212 km/h
132 mph
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.2 s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIMazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
190 hp
142 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
5.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
655 km
407 mi
3,333 km
2,071 mi
Trunk score
485 L
17.1 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIMazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km2.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi4.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal225 L59 US gal49 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year393.75 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Has 59 Nm more
  • Is 567 kg lighter
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 8 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 6.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2,679 km (1,664 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5i P300e
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
350h
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0 TSI
40 TFSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
GLA 220
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220
2.5 e-Skyactiv
GLA 220d
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv - car comparison - FastVsFaster