Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 · Stage 3vsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 · Stage 2vsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 · Stage 1vsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI

2.0 (Stage 3)

412 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI

2.0 (Stage 2)

357 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI

2.0 (Stage 1)

324 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI

2.0

275 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    281 km/h
    175 mph
  • Most powerful
    412 hp
    308 kW
  • Highest torque
    620 Nm
    457 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,539 kg
    3,393 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    268 hp/t
    200 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    181 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    900 km
    559 mi
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    80/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hpChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hpChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hpChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
Power
412hp308kW+137 hp
357hp267kW+82 hp
324hp242kW+49 hp
275hp205kW
Torque
620Nm457lb-ft+220 Nm
540Nm398lb-ft+140 Nm
488Nm360lb-ft+88 Nm
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,539kg3,393lb
1,539kg3,393lb
1,539kg3,393lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
2,120kg4,674lb
2,120kg4,674lb
2,120kg4,674lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
281 km/h
175 mph
+31 km/h
269 km/h
167 mph
+19 km/h
262 km/h
163 mph
+12 km/h
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
66.3s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph-15.6 s
Calculated
71.8s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-10.2 s
Calculated
75.6s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph-6.3 s
Calculated
81.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s-1.3 s
5.0s-0.9 s
5.3s-0.6 s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
15.0s-8.3 s
Calculated
17.4s-5.9 s
Calculated
19.3s-4.0 s
Calculated
23.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s-1.2 s
Calculated
4.8s-0.8 s
Calculated
5.1s-0.5 s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.6s-1.4 s
Calculated
13.1s-0.9 s
Calculated
13.5s-0.6 s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb
Calculated
232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb
Calculated
211hp/t157kW/t96hp/1000 lb
Calculated
179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
403Nm/t270lb-ft/ton
Calculated
351Nm/t235lb-ft/ton
Calculated
317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
900km559mi
Calculated
900km559mi
Calculated
900km559mi
Calculated
900km559mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,784mm188in
4,784mm188in
4,784mm188in
4,784mm188in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,880mm74in
1,880mm74in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,340mm53in
1,340mm53in
1,340mm53in
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase
2,812mm111in
2,812mm111in
2,812mm111in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,610mm63in
1,610mm63in
1,610mm63in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,604mm63in
1,604mm63in
1,604mm63in
Doors
2
2
2
2
Seats
4
4
4
4
Fuel tank
72L
72L
72L
72L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
181g/km
181g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hpChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 2) 357 hpChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 1) 324 hpChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 275 hpPowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 2) 357 hp: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 1) 324 hp: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 275 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hpChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hpChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hpChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
4.8 s
5.1 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
5.0 s
5.3 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.0 s
17.4 s
19.3 s
23.3 s
Top speed
281 km/h
175 mph
269 km/h
167 mph
262 km/h
163 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.7 s
5.8 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.6 s
8.8 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
11.1 s
11.3 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.6 s
13.1 s
13.5 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
176 km/h
110 mph
171 km/h
106 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp has 137 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 275 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 275 hp and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp: 137 hp (103 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp
281 km/h
175 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp
269 km/h
167 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp
262 km/h
163 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 275 hp: 1.3 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 2) 357 hp and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 1) 324 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp
268 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp
232 hp/t
173 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp
211 hp/t
157 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp
412 hp
308 kW
4.6 s
281 km/h
175 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp
357 hp
267 kW
5.0 s
269 km/h
167 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp
324 hp
242 kW
5.3 s
262 km/h
163 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
275 hp
205 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp
Power
412 hp
308 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
281 km/h
175 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp
Power
357 hp
267 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp
Power
324 hp
242 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
262 km/h
163 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp
Power
412 hp
308 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
281 km/h
175 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp
Power
357 hp
267 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp
Power
324 hp
242 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
262 km/h
163 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
4.6 s
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.0 s
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.3 s
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp
268 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp
232 hp/t
173 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp
211 hp/t
157 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hpChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hpChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hpChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp
Power
412 hp
308 kW
357 hp
267 kW
324 hp
242 kW
275 hp
205 kW
Torque
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
540 Nm
398 lb-ft
488 Nm
360 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
5.0 s
5.3 s
5.9 s
Top speed
281 km/h
175 mph
269 km/h
167 mph
262 km/h
163 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
900 km
559 mi
900 km
559 mi
900 km
559 mi
900 km
559 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
181 g/km
181 g/km
181 g/km
Power-to-weight score
268 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
232 hp/t
173 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
211 hp/t
157 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hpChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 2) 357 hpChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 1) 324 hpChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 275 hp
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,100 LC/year2,100 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp

  • Has 55 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 · Stage 3 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 · Stage 2 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 · Stage 1 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster