Chevrolet Camaro VI
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 · Stage 3vsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 · Stage 2vsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 · Stage 1vsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro VI
2.0 (Stage 2)
Chevrolet Camaro VI
2.0 (Stage 1)
Chevrolet Camaro VI
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed281 km/h175 mph
- Most powerful412 hp308 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,539 kg3,393 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions181 g/km
- Best estimated range900 km559 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 412hp308kW+137 hp | 357hp267kW+82 hp | 324hp242kW+49 hp | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft+220 Nm | 540Nm398lb-ft+140 Nm | 488Nm360lb-ft+88 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,539kg3,393lb | 1,539kg3,393lb | 1,539kg3,393lb | 1,539kg3,393lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 269 km/h 167 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph-15.6 s Calculated | 71.8s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-10.2 s Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph-6.3 s Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s-1.3 s | 5.0s-0.9 s | 5.3s-0.6 s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s-8.3 s Calculated | 17.4s-5.9 s Calculated | 19.3s-4.0 s Calculated | 23.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.8s-0.8 s Calculated | 5.1s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s-1.4 s Calculated | 13.1s-0.9 s Calculated | 13.5s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 211hp/t157kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 403Nm/t270lb-ft/ton Calculated | 351Nm/t235lb-ft/ton Calculated | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 900km559mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,784mm188in | 4,784mm188in | 4,784mm188in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,880mm74in | 1,880mm74in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,340mm53in | 1,340mm53in | 1,340mm53in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,812mm111in | 2,812mm111in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,610mm63in | 1,610mm63in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,604mm63in | 1,604mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 72L | 72L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | 181g/km | 181g/km | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 2) 357 hp: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 1) 324 hp: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 275 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 17.4 s | 19.3 s | 23.3 s |
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 269 km/h 167 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.6 s | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.1 s | 11.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.1 s | 13.5 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 176 km/h 110 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 412 hp 308 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 357 hp 267 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 324 hp 242 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | 275 hp 205 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp has 137 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 275 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 275 hp and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp: 137 hp (103 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 4.6 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 5.0 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 5.3 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 275 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 2) 357 hp and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 1) 324 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 900 km 559 mi |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 900 km 559 mi |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 900 km 559 mi |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | 900 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 412 hp 308 kW | 4.6 s | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 357 hp 267 kW | 5.0 s | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 324 hp 242 kW | 5.3 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 3)412 hp | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 2)357 hp | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 (Stage 1)324 hp | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0275 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 412 hp 308 kW | 357 hp 267 kW | 324 hp 242 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 281 km/h 175 mph | 269 km/h 167 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 900 km 559 mi | 900 km 559 mi | 900 km 559 mi | 900 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | 181 g/km | 181 g/km | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 211 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp | Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 2) 357 hp | Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 1) 324 hp | Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 275 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 3) 412 hp
- Has 55 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 (Stage 2) 357 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























