Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 300vsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro VI
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 300
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions143 g/km
- Best estimated range1,048 km651 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t133 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,539kg3,393lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 82.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s Calculated | 23.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,048km651mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,784mm188in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 89mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 400L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 143g/km | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 300: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 23.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 275 hp 205 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 has 30 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 300 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | 6.0 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 300: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 300 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | 1,048 km 651 mi |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 900 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300 | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,048 km 651 mi | 900 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 143 g/km | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 300 | Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 300
- Is 49 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 38 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























