Car comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 2.0vsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017

2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2017-2018
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI

2.0

275 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,525 kg
    3,362 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    197 hp/t
    147 kW/t
    5.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    163 g/km
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
300hp224kW
275hp205kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,525kg3,362lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight-
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
77.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
81.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.7s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
19.9s
Calculated
23.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.4s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb
Calculated
179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
262Nm/t176lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
875km544mi
Calculated
900km559mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,482mm176in
4,784mm188in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,310mm52in
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase
2,622mm103in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,597mm63in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,649mm65in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
310L
-
Max trunk volume
408L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
63L
72L
CO2 emissions
163g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VI2.05,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.4 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.7 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.9 s
23.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.6 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
170 km/h
105 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
300 hp
224 kW
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
275 hp
205 kW

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0 has 25 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
1,525 kg
3,362 lb
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.05.7 s
ChevroletCamaro VI2.05.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
875 km
544 mi
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
900 km
559 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
300 hp
224 kW
5.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
275 hp
205 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,482 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,310 mm
51.6 in
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
5.7 s
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
275 hp
205 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.7 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,525 kg
3,362 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
310 L
10.9 cu ft
Length
4,482 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,310 mm
51.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
875 km
544 mi
900 km
559 mi
CO2 score
163 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
310 L
10.9 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
197 hp/t
147 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 2.0

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Is 14 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 18 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

  • Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-type Coupe 2.0
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0
2.0
2.0 T
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsJaguarF-type Coupe3.0 V6
2.0
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20172.0
2.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20202.0
2.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsJaguarF-type Convertible3.0 V6
2.0
3.0 TDI
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsAUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI
2.0
E 350
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20172.0vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350
2.0
GLC 350d
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 2.0 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster