Car comparison

BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430ivsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)

430i

252 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2016-2016
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI

2.0

275 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    151 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    923 km
    574 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

  • Most powerful
    275 hp
    205 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    179 hp/t
    133 kW/t
    5.6 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430iChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
252hp188kW
275hp205kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
2,010kg4,431lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
80.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
81.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
21.3s
Calculated
23.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
923km574mi
Calculated
900km559mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,638mm183in
4,784mm188in
Width
1,825mm72in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,377mm54in
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase
2,810mm111in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance
130mm5in
-
Trunk volume
445L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
60L
72L
CO2 emissions
151g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430iChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0PowerTorque
  • BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i5,200 rpm1,450-4,800 rpm5,450 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VI2.05,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430iChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.3 s
23.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
252 hp
188 kW
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
275 hp
205 kW

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 has 23 hp more than BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 23 hp (17 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i5.9 s
ChevroletCamaro VI2.05.9 s

Although Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 has more power, BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
923 km
574 mi
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
900 km
559 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
252 hp
188 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
275 hp
205 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,377 mm
54.2 in
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
5.9 s
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430iChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
275 hp
205 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,377 mm
54.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
923 km
574 mi
900 km
559 mi
CO2 score
151 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430iChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i

  • Is 49 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 30 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

  • Has 23 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

430i
430i
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430ivsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430i
2.0
2.0 T
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
430i
430i
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430ivsBMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i
2.0
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
430i
430i
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430ivsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)Facelift 2017430i
2.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
430i
430i
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430ivsBMW4 Series Coupe (G22)430i
2.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
430i
430i
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430ivsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (G26)430i
2.0
3.0 TDI
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsAUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI
430i
430i
VS
BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430ivsBMW4 Series Convertible (F33)430i
2.0
GLC 350d
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i vs Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster