Car comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8vsBentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 4.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2010-2016
VS

Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015

4.0 V8

507 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.2 s
  • Lightest
    2,425 kg
    5,346 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    209 hp/t
    156 kW/t
    4.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.9 L/100 km
    14.8 mpg US
    17.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    826 km
    513 mi
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    296 km/h
    184 mph
  • Most powerful
    512 hp
    382 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,020 Nm
    752 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    443 L
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    70/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
Power
512hp382kW
507hp378kW
Torque
1,020Nm752lb-ft
660Nm487lb-ft
Curb weight
2,585kg5,699lb
2,425kg5,346lb
Gross weight
3,090kg6,812lb
2,972kg6,552lb
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
295 km/h
183 mph
To 99% top speed
66.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
64.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.3s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
15.2s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.1s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
13.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton
Calculated
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
568km353mi
Calculated
826km513mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,752cc412cu in
3,993cc244cu in
Length
5,575mm219in
5,299mm209in
Width
1,926mm76in
1,976mm78in
Height
1,521mm60in
1,488mm59in
Wheelbase
3,266mm129in
3,066mm121in
Front track
1,615mm64in
1,643mm65in
Rear track
1,652mm65in
1,642mm65in
Trunk volume
443L
442L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
96L
90L
CO2 emissions-
254g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V84,200 rpm1,750 rpm4,450 rpm
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V86,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.1 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.3 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.2 s
14.9 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
295 km/h
183 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
13.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
187 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
507 hp
378 kW

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 has 5 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
660 Nm
487 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
2,585 kg
5,699 lb
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
2,425 kg
5,346 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
295 km/h
183 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V85.3 s
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V85.2 s

Although Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 has more power, Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 6.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
209 hp/t
156 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
568 km
353 mi
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
826 km
513 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.3 s
296 km/h
184 mph
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
507 hp
378 kW
5.2 s
295 km/h
183 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
5.3 s
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
209 hp/t
156 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
507 hp
378 kW
Torque
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.3 s
5.2 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
295 km/h
183 mph
Lightness
2,585 kg
5,699 lb
2,425 kg
5,346 lb
Fuel consumption
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
Range score
568 km
353 mi
826 km
513 mi
CO2 score
-
254 g/km
Trunk score
443 L
15.6 cu ft
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
209 hp/t
156 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
Consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km29.57 LC100 km19.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi47.60 LC100 mi30.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,436 LC/year2,861 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 360 Nm more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8

  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 258 km (160 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Bentley Flying Spur II 4.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
6.75 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
6.75 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
6.75 V8
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
6.75 V8
6.3 FSI W12
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12
4.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
6.75 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
4.0 V8
S 600 V12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (X222)S 600 V12
6.75 V8
4.0 TFSI V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsAUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 vs Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster