Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 4.0 V8vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions254 g/km
- Best estimated range826 km513 mi
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score78/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight272 hp/t203 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score80/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,425kg5,346lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,972kg6,552lb | - |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 46.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated | 272hp/t203kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 826km513mi Calculated | 721km448mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,993cc244cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,299mm209in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,976mm78in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,488mm59in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,066mm121in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,643mm65in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 442L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 254g/km | 264g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 has 3 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 5.2 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 and Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 826 km 513 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 721 km 448 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 5.2 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 826 km 513 mi | 721 km 448 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 254 g/km | 264 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
- Has 35 Nm more
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 105 km (65 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 550 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























