Bentley Mulsanne EWB
Car comparison
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8vsBentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Lightest2,425 kg5,346 lb
- Best power-to-weight209 hp/t156 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions254 g/km
- Best estimated range826 km513 mi
- Best economy score78/100
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
- Fastest top speed296 km/h184 mph
- Most powerful512 hp382 kW
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
- Largest trunk446 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 512hp382kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 1,020Nm752lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,730kg6,019lb | 2,425kg5,346lb |
| Gross weight | 3,200kg7,055lb | 2,972kg6,552lb |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.4s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated | 64.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | 826km513mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,752cc412cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 5,825mm229in | 5,299mm209in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 1,976mm78in |
| Height | 1,541mm61in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,516mm138in | 3,066mm121in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,643mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,642mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 446L | 442L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 344g/km | 254g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.9 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 has 5 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 5.5 s |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 5.2 s |
Although Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 has more power, Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 658 km 409 mi |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 826 km 513 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.5 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 5.2 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 |
| 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 512 hp 382 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | 826 km 513 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 344 g/km | 254 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 446 L 15.8 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 | Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.55 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,833 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 360 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 168 km (104 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 90 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























