Bentley Continental Flying Spur
Car comparison
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48VvsBentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed312 km/h194 mph
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Lightest2,425 kg5,346 lb
- Lowest city consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,475kg5,456lb | 2,425kg5,346lb |
| Gross weight | 2,980kg6,570lb | 2,972kg6,552lb |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated | 64.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.4L/100 km8.9mpg US10.7mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 826km513mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 5,307mm209in | 5,299mm209in |
| Width | 1,937mm76in | 1,976mm78in |
| Height | 1,479mm58in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,065mm121in | 3,066mm121in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,643mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,642mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 442L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 254g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: Power / Torque
- Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 118 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V has 53 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 and Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: 53 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 5.2 s |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW | 5.2 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 5.2 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 826 km 513 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 254 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
- Has 53 hp more
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 33 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























