Bentley Continental GTC II
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12vsBentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental Flying Spur
6.0 i W12 48V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Most powerful567 hp423 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption23.0 L/100 km10.2 mpg US12.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score67/100
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
- Lightest2,475 kg5,456 lb
- Best overall score80/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 567hp423kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | 2,475kg5,456lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.9s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 23L/100 km10.2mpg US12.3mpg UK | 26.4L/100 km8.9mpg US10.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 5,307mm209in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,937mm76in |
| Height | 1,403mm55in | 1,479mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 3,065mm121in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,607mm63in |
| Trunk volume | - | 475L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 347g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 14.2 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 191 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 has 7 hp more than Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V and Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 312 km/h 194 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 4.7 s |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW | 4.7 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW | 5.2 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12 | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 567 hp 423 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 347 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
- Is 20 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























