Car comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 6.75 V8vsBentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2020
VS

Bentley Mulsanne EWB

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    296 km/h
    184 mph
  • Most powerful
    512 hp
    382 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,020 Nm
    752 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,685 kg
    5,919 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    191 hp/t
    142 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    14.6 L/100 km
    16.1 mpg US
    19.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    22.8 L/100 km
    10.3 mpg US
    12.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.9 L/100 km
    23.8 mpg US
    28.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    342 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    658 km
    409 mi
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    68/100
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512hp382kW
512hp382kW
Torque
1,020Nm752lb-ft
1,020Nm752lb-ft
Curb weight
2,685kg5,919lb
2,730kg6,019lb
Gross weight
3,200kg7,055lb
3,200kg7,055lb
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
To 99% top speed
66.9s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
70.4s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.3s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
15.2s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.1s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton
Calculated
374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
658km409mi
Calculated
658km409mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,752cc412cu in
6,752cc412cu in
Length
5,575mm219in
5,825mm229in
Width
1,926mm76in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,521mm60in
1,541mm61in
Wheelbase
3,266mm129in
3,516mm138in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,651mm65in
Trunk volume
443L
446L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
96L
96L
CO2 emissions
342g/km
344g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V84,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V84,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.1 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.3 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.2 s
15.9 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
2,685 kg
5,919 lb
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
2,730 kg
6,019 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V85.3 s
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V85.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
191 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
658 km
409 mi
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
658 km
409 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.3 s
296 km/h
184 mph
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.5 s
296 km/h
184 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,825 mm
229.3 in
Height
1,541 mm
60.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
5.3 s
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
191 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
512 hp
382 kW
Torque
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.3 s
5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
Lightness
2,685 kg
5,919 lb
2,730 kg
6,019 lb
Fuel consumption
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,825 mm
229.3 in
Height
1,541 mm
60.7 in
Range score
658 km
409 mi
658 km
409 mi
CO2 score
342 g/km
344 g/km
Trunk score
443 L
15.6 cu ft
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
191 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
Consumption14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.55 LC100 km25.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.12 LC100 mi41.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,833 LC/year3,833 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8

  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 2 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
6.75 V8
Speed 6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
6.75 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8vsBentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
6.75 V8
F 5.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8
6.75 V8
S 560 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8vsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (X222)Facelift 2017S 560 V8
6.75 V8
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8vsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
6.75 V8
V 3.6 V6
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8vsCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
6.75 V8
5.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
6.75 V8
S Q4 3.0 V6
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 2017S Q4 3.0 V6
Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 vs Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster