Car comparison

Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8vsBentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 6.75 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Flying Spur III

4.0 V8

550 hp3996 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSedan2020-2024
VS

Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    318 km/h
    198 mph
  • Most powerful
    550 hp
    410 kW
  • Lightest
    2,330 kg
    5,137 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    236 hp/t
    176 kW/t
    4.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.6 L/100 km
    20.3 mpg US
    24.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.5 L/100 km
    14.3 mpg US
    17.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    776 km
    482 mi
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    89/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
Power
550hp410kW
512hp382kW
Torque
770Nm568lb-ft
1,020Nm752lb-ft
Curb weight
2,330kg5,137lb
2,685kg5,919lb
Gross weight
2,980kg6,570lb
3,200kg7,055lb
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
To 99% top speed
53.3s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph
Calculated
66.9s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
11.0s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
5.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.8s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton
Calculated
380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
776km482mi
Calculated
658km409mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,996cc244cu in
6,752cc412cu in
Length
5,316mm209in
5,575mm219in
Width
2,013mm79in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,483mm58in
1,521mm60in
Wheelbase
3,194mm126in
3,266mm129in
Front track-
1,605mm63in
Rear track-
1,651mm65in
Trunk volume
420L
443L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
90L
96L
CO2 emissions-
342g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V86,000 rpm2,000-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V84,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
5.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.0 s
15.2 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.0 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.8 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
129 mph
185 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW

Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 has 38 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 and Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8: 38 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
770 Nm
568 lb-ft
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
2,330 kg
5,137 lb
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
2,685 kg
5,919 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
318 km/h
198 mph
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
191 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
776 km
482 mi
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
658 km
409 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.1 s
318 km/h
198 mph
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.3 s
296 km/h
184 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,483 mm
58.4 in
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
4.1 s
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
5.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
191 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
512 hp
382 kW
Torque
770 Nm
568 lb-ft
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
5.3 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
Lightness
2,330 kg
5,137 lb
2,685 kg
5,919 lb
Fuel consumption
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,483 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Range score
776 km
482 mi
658 km
409 mi
CO2 score
-
342 g/km
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
191 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8
Consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.30 LC100 km25.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.67 LC100 mi41.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,045 LC/year3,833 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8

  • Has 38 hp more
  • Is 355 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 118 km (74 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 vs Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster