Bentley Flying Spur III
Car comparison
Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8vsBentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 6.75 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016
6.75 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Lightest2,330 kg5,137 lb
- Best power-to-weight236 hp/t176 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.5 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range776 km482 mi
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score76/100
Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
- Largest trunk443 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 512hp382kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 1,020Nm752lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 2,685kg5,919lb |
| Gross weight | 2,980kg6,570lb | 3,200kg7,055lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.3s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 66.9s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.0s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 776km482mi Calculated | 658km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 6,752cc412cu in |
| Length | 5,316mm209in | 5,575mm219in |
| Width | 2,013mm79in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,483mm58in | 1,521mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 3,194mm126in | 3,266mm129in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,651mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 443L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 96L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 342g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.0 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW |
Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 has 38 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 and Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 2,330 kg 5,137 lb |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 2,685 kg 5,919 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 4.1 s |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 776 km 482 mi |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 658 km 409 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.1 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 |
| 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8 | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 512 hp 382 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,330 kg 5,137 lb | 2,685 kg 5,919 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 776 km 482 mi | 658 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 342 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8 | Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 25.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 3,833 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Flying Spur III 4.0 V8
- Has 38 hp more
- Is 355 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 118 km (74 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8
- Has 250 Nm more
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























