Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 6.75 V8vsBentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Flying Spur III
Hybrid 2.9 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8
- Fastest top speed296 km/h184 mph
- Most powerful512 hp382 kW
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t142 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk443 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score68/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Lightest2,430 kg5,357 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 512hp382kW | 416hp310kW |
| Torque | 1,020Nm752lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,685kg5,919lb | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Gross weight | 3,200kg7,055lb | 3,030kg6,680lb |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.9s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated | 54.0s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 6,752cc412cu in | 2,894cc177cu in |
| Length | 5,575mm219in | 5,316mm209in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 1,978mm78in |
| Height | 1,521mm60in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,266mm129in | 3,194mm126in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 443L | 351L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 342g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW |
Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 has 96 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: 96 hp (72 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 2,685 kg 5,919 lb |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 5.3 s |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 4.3 s |
Although Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 has more power, Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW | 4.3 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 512 hp 382 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,685 kg 5,919 lb | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 342 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | 351 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,833 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8
- Has 96 hp more
- Has 470 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 92 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























