Car comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 6.75 V8vsBentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2020
VS

Bentley Flying Spur III

Hybrid 2.9 V6

416 hp2894 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2021-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    296 km/h
    184 mph
  • Most powerful
    512 hp
    382 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,020 Nm
    752 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    191 hp/t
    142 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    443 L
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    68/100
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6
Power
512hp382kW
416hp310kW
Torque
1,020Nm752lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
2,685kg5,919lb
2,430kg5,357lb
Gross weight
3,200kg7,055lb
3,030kg6,680lb
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
285 km/h
177 mph
To 99% top speed
66.9s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
54.0s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.3s
4.3s
0-200 km/h
15.2s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.1s
Calculated
4.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
658km409mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
6,752cc412cu in
2,894cc177cu in
Length
5,575mm219in
5,316mm209in
Width
1,926mm76in
1,978mm78in
Height
1,521mm60in
1,483mm58in
Wheelbase
3,266mm129in
3,194mm126in
Front track
1,605mm63in
-
Rear track
1,651mm65in
-
Trunk volume
443L
351L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
96L
80L
CO2 emissions
342g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.1 s
4.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.3 s
4.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.2 s
12.9 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
285 km/h
177 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
194 km/h
121 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6
416 hp
310 kW

Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 has 96 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: 96 hp (72 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
2,685 kg
5,919 lb
BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6
2,430 kg
5,357 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph
BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6
285 km/h
177 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 has more power, Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: 1.0 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
191 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.3 s
296 km/h
184 mph
BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6
416 hp
310 kW
4.3 s
285 km/h
177 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6
Power
416 hp
310 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
285 km/h
177 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
351 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,483 mm
58.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8BentleyFlying Spur IIIHybrid 2.9 V6
Power
512 hp
382 kW
416 hp
310 kW
Torque
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.3 s
4.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
285 km/h
177 mph
Lightness
2,685 kg
5,919 lb
2,430 kg
5,357 lb
Fuel consumption
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
351 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,483 mm
58.4 in
Range score
658 km
409 mi
-
CO2 score
342 g/km
-
Trunk score
443 L
15.6 cu ft
351 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
191 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8
Consumption14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,833 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8

  • Has 96 hp more
  • Has 470 Nm more
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 92 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 vs Bentley Flying Spur III Hybrid 2.9 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster