Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 6.75 V8vsBentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Mulsanne II
6.75 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 2016-2020
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed296 km/h184 mph
- Most powerful512 hp382 kW
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.8 L/100 km10.3 mpg US12.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range658 km409 mi
- Largest trunk443 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score68/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 2010-2016
- Lightest2,585 kg5,699 lb
- Best power-to-weight198 hp/t148 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 512hp382kW | 512hp382kW |
| Torque | 1,020Nm752lb-ft | 1,020Nm752lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,685kg5,919lb | 2,585kg5,699lb |
| Gross weight | 3,200kg7,055lb | 3,090kg6,812lb |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.9s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated | 66.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | 568km353mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,752cc412cu in | 6,752cc412cu in |
| Length | 5,575mm219in | 5,575mm219in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,521mm60in | 1,521mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 3,266mm129in | 3,266mm129in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 443L | 443L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 96L |
| CO2 emissions | 342g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 2016-2020: Power / Torque
- Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 2010-2016: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 4,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 512 hp 382 kW |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 512 hp 382 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 2,685 kg 5,919 lb |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 5.3 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 5.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 2016-2020 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 2010-2016: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 658 km 409 mi |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 568 km 353 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 |
| 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 2016-2020 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V82016-2020 | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V82010-2016 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 512 hp 382 kW | 512 hp 382 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,685 kg 5,919 lb | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | 568 km 353 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 342 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 2016-2020 | Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 2010-2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.55 LC100 km | 29.57 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,833 LC/year | 4,436 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 2016-2020
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 89 km (56 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 2010-2016
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























