Bentley Mulsanne II
Car comparison
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8vsAUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A8L (D4/4H)
6.3 FSI W12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Lightest2,055 kg4,530 lb
- Best power-to-weight243 hp/t181 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.6 L/100 km14.2 mpg US17.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range756 km470 mi
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Fastest top speed296 km/h184 mph
- Most powerful512 hp382 kW
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 512hp382kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 1,020Nm752lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,585kg5,699lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Gross weight | 3,090kg6,812lb | 2,655kg5,853lb |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated | 45.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 568km353mi Calculated | 756km470mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,752cc412cu in | 6,299cc384cu in |
| Length | 5,575mm219in | 5,267mm207in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 1,949mm77in |
| Height | 1,521mm60in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,266mm129in | 3,122mm123in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,635mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 443L | 510L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 906L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
- AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 4,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 6,200 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 13.9 s |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 191 km/h 119 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 500 hp 373 kW |
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 has 12 hp more than AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 5.3 s |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 4.7 s |
Although Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 has more power, AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 5.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 568 km 353 mi |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 756 km 470 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | AUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 512 hp 382 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 568 km 353 mi | 756 km 470 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 | AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.57 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,436 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 395 Nm more
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A8L (D4/4H) 6.3 FSI W12
- Is 530 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 188 km (117 mi) more estimated range
- Has 67 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























