Car comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8vsBentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2010-2016
VS

Bentley Arnage T

6.8i V8 Biturbo

507 hp6761 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    296 km/h
    184 mph
  • Most powerful
    512 hp
    382 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,020 Nm
    752 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,585 kg
    5,699 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    198 hp/t
    148 kW/t
    5.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    16.9 L/100 km
    13.9 mpg US
    16.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    25.3 L/100 km
    9.3 mpg US
    11.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    568 km
    353 mi
  • Largest trunk
    443 L
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    62/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Power
512hp382kW
507hp378kW
Torque
1,020Nm752lb-ft
1,000Nm738lb-ft
Curb weight
2,585kg5,699lb
2,585kg5,699lb
Gross weight
3,090kg6,812lb
3,065kg6,757lb
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
288 km/h
179 mph
To 99% top speed
66.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
67.5s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.3s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
15.2s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.1s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
19.5L/100 km12.1mpg US14.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK
28.8L/100 km8.2mpg US9.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton
Calculated
387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
568km353mi
Calculated
492km306mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,752cc412cu in
6,761cc413cu in
Length
5,575mm219in
5,400mm213in
Width
1,926mm76in
1,900mm75in
Height
1,521mm60in
1,515mm60in
Wheelbase
3,266mm129in
3,116mm123in
Front track
1,615mm64in
1,602mm63in
Rear track
1,652mm65in
1,602mm63in
Trunk volume
443L
-
Max trunk volume-
374L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
96L
96L
CO2 emissions-
465g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 BiturboPowerTorque
  • Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V84,200 rpm1,750 rpm4,450 rpm
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo4,200 rpm3,200 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.1 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.3 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.2 s
16.2 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
288 km/h
179 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
181 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
507 hp
378 kW

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 has 5 hp more than Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
2,585 kg
5,699 lb
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
2,585 kg
5,699 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
288 km/h
179 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V85.3 s
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo5.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 and Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
19.5 L/100 km
12.1 mpg US
14.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 and Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
196 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
568 km
353 mi
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
492 km
306 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.3 s
296 km/h
184 mph
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
507 hp
378 kW
5.5 s
288 km/h
179 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
288 km/h
179 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
374 L
13.2 cu ft
Length
5,400 mm
212.6 in
Height
1,515 mm
59.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
288 km/h
179 mph
19.5 L/100 km
12.1 mpg US
14.5 mpg UK

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
5.3 s
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
19.5 L/100 km
12.1 mpg US
14.5 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
196 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
19.5 L/100 km
12.1 mpg US
14.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Power
512 hp
382 kW
507 hp
378 kW
Torque
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.3 s
5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
288 km/h
179 mph
Lightness
2,585 kg
5,699 lb
2,585 kg
5,699 lb
Fuel consumption
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
19.5 L/100 km
12.1 mpg US
14.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
374 L
13.2 cu ft
Length
5,400 mm
212.6 in
Height
1,515 mm
59.6 in
Range score
568 km
353 mi
492 km
306 mi
CO2 score
-
465 g/km
Trunk score
443 L
15.6 cu ft
374 L
13.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
196 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
Consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK19.5 L/100 km12.1 mpg US14.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km29.57 LC100 km34.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi47.60 LC100 mi54.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal2,925 L773 US gal643 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,436 LC/year5,119 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 76 km (47 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 69 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
6.7 i V8 16V
VS
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 BiturbovsBentleyArnage R6.7 i V8 16V
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 BiturbovsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
6.75 V8
6.3 FSI W12
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12
6.75 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
6.0 W12 48V
VS
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 BiturbovsVolkswagenPhaeton6.0 W12 48V
6.75 V8
4.0 TFSI V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsAUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
AMG S 63 V8
VS
BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 BiturbovsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)AMG S 63 V8
6.75 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 vs Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster