Car comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Mulsanne II

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2010-2016
VS

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011

AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8

507 hp6208 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2013-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,730 kg
    3,814 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    293 hp/t
    219 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.0 L/100 km
    19.6 mpg US
    23.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.2 L/100 km
    12.9 mpg US
    15.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    475 L
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    87/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    296 km/h
    184 mph
  • Most powerful
    512 hp
    382 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,020 Nm
    752 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    568 km
    353 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Power
512hp382kW
507hp378kW
Torque
1,020Nm752lb-ft
610Nm450lb-ft
Curb weight
2,585kg5,699lb
1,730kg3,814lb
Gross weight
3,090kg6,812lb
2,185kg4,817lb
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
63.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
40.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.3s
4.2s
0-200 km/h
14.9s
Calculated
10.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.1s
Calculated
4.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK
18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
11.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton
Calculated
353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
568km353mi
Calculated
550km342mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,752cc412cu in
6,208cc379cu in
Length
5,575mm219in
-
Height
1,521mm60in
-
Wheelbase
3,266mm129in
-
Front track
1,615mm64in
-
Rear track
1,652mm65in
-
Trunk volume
443L
475L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
96L
66L
CO2 emissions-
280g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V84,200 rpm1,750 rpm4,450 rpm
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V86,800 rpm5,200 rpm8,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.1 s
4.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.3 s
4.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.9 s
10.9 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
10.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
11.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
210 km/h
130 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
507 hp
378 kW

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 has 5 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
610 Nm
450 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
2,585 kg
5,699 lb
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
1,730 kg
3,814 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V85.3 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V84.2 s

Although Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 4.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
568 km
353 mi
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
550 km
342 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.3 s
296 km/h
184 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
507 hp
378 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length-
Height-

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
5.3 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
4.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
507 hp
378 kW
Torque
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
610 Nm
450 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.3 s
4.2 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Lightness
2,585 kg
5,699 lb
1,730 kg
3,814 lb
Fuel consumption
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length-
Height-
Range score
568 km
353 mi
550 km
342 mi
CO2 score
-
280 g/km
Trunk score
443 L
15.6 cu ft
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
198 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km29.57 LC100 km21.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi47.60 LC100 mi33.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,436 LC/year3,150 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 410 Nm more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8

  • Is 855 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 4.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 95 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 32 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
AMG C 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
AMG C 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)AMG C 63 V8
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
6.75 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
AMG C 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8
6.75 V8
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8vsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
AMG C 43
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster