Bentley Mulsanne II
Car comparison
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8vsAUDI S8 (D4) 4.0 TFSI V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI S8 (D4)
4.0 TFSI V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI S8 (D4) 4.0 TFSI V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Most powerful520 hp388 kW
- Lightest1,975 kg4,354 lb
- Best power-to-weight263 hp/t196 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range891 km554 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Fastest top speed296 km/h184 mph
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 512hp382kW | 520hp388kW |
| Torque | 1,020Nm752lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,585kg5,699lb | 1,975kg4,354lb |
| Gross weight | 3,090kg6,812lb | 2,575kg5,677lb |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated | 39.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 329Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 568km353mi Calculated | 891km554mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,752cc412cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 5,575mm219in | 5,146mm203in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 1,949mm77in |
| Height | 1,521mm60in | 1,458mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,266mm129in | 2,994mm118in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | 1,632mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,623mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 443L | 520L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 235g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
- AUDI S8 (D4) 4.0 TFSI V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 4,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 12.3 s |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | 520 hp 388 kW |
AUDI S8 (D4) 4.0 TFSI V8 has 8 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 and AUDI S8 (D4) 4.0 TFSI V8: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 5.3 s |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S8 (D4) 4.0 TFSI V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI S8 (D4) 4.0 TFSI V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 6.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 568 km 353 mi |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | 891 km 554 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | 520 hp 388 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI S8 (D4) 4.0 TFSI V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | AUDIS8 (D4)4.0 TFSI V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 512 hp 382 kW | 520 hp 388 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 568 km 353 mi | 891 km 554 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 235 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 | AUDI S8 (D4) 4.0 TFSI V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.57 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,436 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Has 370 Nm more
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI S8 (D4) 4.0 TFSI V8
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 610 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 6.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 65 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 323 km (201 mi) more estimated range
- Has 77 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























