Bentley Continental Flying Spur
Car comparison
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48VvsBentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 6.75 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016
6.75 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed312 km/h194 mph
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Lightest2,475 kg5,456 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption22.8 L/100 km10.3 mpg US12.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best economy score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 512hp382kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 1,020Nm752lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,475kg5,456lb | 2,685kg5,919lb |
| Gross weight | 2,980kg6,570lb | 3,200kg7,055lb |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated | 66.9s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.4L/100 km8.9mpg US10.7mpg UK | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 658km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 6,752cc412cu in |
| Length | 5,307mm209in | 5,575mm219in |
| Width | 1,937mm76in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,479mm58in | 1,521mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 3,065mm121in | 3,266mm129in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,651mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 443L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 96L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 342g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: Power / Torque
- Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 118 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW |
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V has 48 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 and Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: 48 hp (36 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 2,685 kg 5,919 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 5.2 s |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW | 5.2 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 512 hp 382 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb | 2,685 kg 5,919 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 658 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 342 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,833 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
- Has 48 hp more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 32 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 6.75 V8
- Has 370 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























