Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6vsBentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed307 km/h191 mph
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight323 hp/t241 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions198 g/km
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Best estimated range826 km513 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 2,425kg5,346lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,972kg6,552lb |
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 38.5s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph Calculated | 64.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.8s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 323hp/t241kW/t146hp/1000 lb Calculated | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 826km513mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,891cc176cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,639mm183in | 5,299mm209in |
| Width | 1,873mm74in | 1,976mm78in |
| Height | 1,426mm56in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 3,066mm121in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,643mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,642mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 442L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 198g/km | 254g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
- Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.8 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 136 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 has 3 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 3.9 s |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 and Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 and Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 682 km 424 mi |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 826 km 513 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.9 s | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 5.2 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 2,425 kg 5,346 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 826 km 513 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 198 g/km | 254 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 | Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 845 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 114 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
- Emits 56 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 143 km (89 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























