Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

510 hp2891 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboSedan2016-2018
VS

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018

AMG C 63 S V8

510 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    307 km/h
    191 mph
  • Most powerful
    510 hp
    380 kW
  • Lightest
    1,580 kg
    3,483 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    323 hp/t
    241 kW/t
    3.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.8 L/100 km
    18.4 mpg US
    22.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    198 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    682 km
    424 mi
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
Power
510hp380kW
510hp380kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,580kg3,483lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Gross weight-
2,180kg4,806lb
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Unrestricted
305 km/h190 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
38.5s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph
Calculated
39.8s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
4.0s
0-200 km/h
9.8s
Calculated
10.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
3.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.4s
Calculated
11.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
323hp/t241kW/t146hp/1000 lb
Calculated
304hp/t226kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton
Calculated
417Nm/t279lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
667km414mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,891cc176cu in
3,982cc243cu in
Length
4,639mm183in
4,757mm187in
Width
1,873mm74in
1,839mm72in
Height
1,426mm56in
1,426mm56in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,840mm112in
Front track
1,555mm61in
1,609mm63in
Rear track
1,607mm63in
-
Ground clearance-
92mm4in
Trunk volume
480L
435L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
58L
66L
CO2 emissions
198g/km
227g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V66,500 rpm2,500 rpm6,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V85,500-6,250 rpm2,000-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
3.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.9 s
4.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.8 s
10.1 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Unrestricted
305 km/h190 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.4 s
11.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
218 km/h
136 mph
216 km/h
134 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
307 km/h
191 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
Unrestricted
305 km/h190 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
304 hp/t
226 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
510 hp
380 kW
3.9 s
307 km/h
191 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
510 hp
380 kW
4.0 s
Unrestricted
305 km/h190 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,639 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
305 km/h190 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,757 mm
187.3 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
305 km/h190 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
3.9 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
4.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
304 hp/t
226 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.9 s
4.0 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Unrestricted
305 km/h190 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Lightness
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
Fuel consumption
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,639 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,757 mm
187.3 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
667 km
414 mi
CO2 score
198 g/km
227 g/km
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
304 hp/t
226 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8
Consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.88 LC100 km17.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.94 LC100 mi27.88 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,231 LC/year2,599 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

  • Is 100 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 29 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 vs Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster