Car comparison

Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6

510 hp2891 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboSedan2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    322 km/h
    200 mph
  • Most powerful
    600 hp
    447 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    344 hp/t
    256 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Power
600hp447kW
510hp380kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,745kg3,847lb
1,580kg3,483lb
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
307 km/h
191 mph
To 99% top speed
37.7s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph
Calculated
38.5s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
9.0s
Calculated
9.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
3.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.0s
Calculated
11.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
344hp/t256kW/t156hp/1000 lb
Calculated
323hp/t241kW/t146hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
682km424mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
2,891cc176cu in
Length
4,713mm186in
4,639mm183in
Width-
1,873mm74in
Height
1,436mm57in
1,426mm56in
Wheelbase
2,835mm112in
2,820mm111in
Front track-
1,555mm61in
Rear track-
1,607mm63in
Trunk volume
450L
480L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank-
58L
CO2 emissions-
198g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V86,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V66,500 rpm2,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
3.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.0 s
9.8 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
307 km/h
191 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.4 s
9.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.0 s
11.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
227 km/h
141 mph
218 km/h
136 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8
600 hp
447 kW
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
510 hp
380 kW

Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8 has 90 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 and Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8: 90 hp (67 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
1,580 kg
3,483 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8
322 km/h
200 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
307 km/h
191 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8
344 hp/t
256 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8
600 hp
447 kW
3.7 s
322 km/h
200 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
510 hp
380 kW
3.9 s
307 km/h
191 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,713 mm
185.6 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,639 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
3.9 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
307 km/h
191 mph
Lightness
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
Fuel consumption
-
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,713 mm
185.6 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,639 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
Range score
-
682 km
424 mi
CO2 score
-
198 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
344 hp/t
256 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8

  • Has 90 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster