Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8vsAUDI S8 (D4) · Facelift 2013 4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI S8 (D4) · Facelift 2013
4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI S8 (D4) Facelift 2013 4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus
- Most powerful605 hp451 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score86/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed322 km/h200 mph
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight344 hp/t256 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 605hp451kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 39.4s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated | 40.0s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.1s Calculated | 9.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.1s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 344hp/t256kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated | 304hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated | 377Nm/t252lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 820km510mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,713mm186in | 5,147mm203in |
| Width | 2,075mm82in | 1,949mm77in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,458mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,994mm118in |
| Front track | - | 1,632mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,623mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 520L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 231g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- AUDI S8 (D4) Facelift 2013 4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus | 6,100-6,800 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.1 s | 9.8 s |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.1 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus | 605 hp 451 kW |
AUDI S8 (D4) Facelift 2013 4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus has 5 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8 and AUDI S8 (D4) Facelift 2013 4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus | 305 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
| AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus | 3.8 s |
Although AUDI S8 (D4) Facelift 2013 4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8 and AUDI S8 (D4) Facelift 2013 4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 344 hp/t 256 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus | 304 hp/t 227 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.7 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus | 605 hp 451 kW | 3.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | AUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 605 hp 451 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 820 km 510 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 231 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 344 hp/t 256 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 304 hp/t 227 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI S8 (D4) Facelift 2013 4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
AUDI S8 (D4) Facelift 2013 4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























