Cadillac CTS III
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8vsJaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
SV Project 8 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed322 km/h200 mph
- Most powerful649 hp484 kW
- Highest torque855 Nm631 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight345 hp/t257 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score86/100
- Best economy score70/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best performance score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 | JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 649hp484kW | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | 855Nm631lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 40.7s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated | 39.4s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.2s Calculated | 9.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.1s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 345hp/t257kW/t157hp/1000 lb Calculated | 344hp/t256kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 455Nm/t304lb-ft/ton Calculated | 401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 522km324mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,021mm198in | 4,713mm186in |
| Width | 1,833mm72in | 2,075mm82in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,910mm115in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,577mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,554mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 447L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 | JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.2 s | 9.1 s |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.1 s | 11.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 223 km/h 139 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 | 649 hp 484 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 has 49 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8 and Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8: 49 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 | 855 Nm 631 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 322 km/h 200 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 | 3.7 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 344 hp/t 256 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 | 649 hp 484 kW | 3.7 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.7 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8 | JaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 649 hp 484 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 855 Nm 631 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 522 km 324 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 447 L 15.8 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 344 hp/t 256 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,623 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8
- Has 49 hp more
- Has 155 Nm more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XE (X760) SV Project 8 5.0 V8
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























