Car comparison

Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 S 6.0 W12vsCadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015

S 6.0 W12

635 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDTwin-turboSedan2016-2019
VS

Cadillac CTS III

V 6.2 V8

649 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2016-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Most powerful
    649 hp
    484 kW
  • Highest torque
    855 Nm
    631 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,880 kg
    4,145 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    345 hp/t
    257 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.8 L/100 km
    14.0 mpg US
    16.8 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    86/100
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    70/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
Power
635hp474kW
649hp484kW
Torque
820Nm605lb-ft
855Nm631lb-ft
Curb weight
2,475kg5,456lb
1,880kg4,145lb
Gross weight
2,972kg6,552lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Calculated
322 km/h
200 mph
To 99% top speed
57.7s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
40.7s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.5s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
11.5s
Calculated
9.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.3s
Calculated
3.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK
16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.1s
Calculated
11.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
257hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb
Calculated
345hp/t257kW/t157hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
331Nm/t222lb-ft/ton
Calculated
455Nm/t304lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
612km380mi
Calculated
522km324mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,998cc366cu in
6,162cc376cu in
Length
5,299mm209in
5,021mm198in
Width-
1,833mm72in
Height
1,488mm59in
1,454mm57in
Wheelbase
3,066mm121in
2,910mm115in
Front track-
1,577mm62in
Rear track-
1,554mm61in
Trunk volume
475L
447L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
90L
72L
CO2 emissions
335g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 6.0 W12Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W126,000 rpm2,000 rpm6,250 rpm
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V86,400 rpm3,600 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.3 s
3.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.5 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.5 s
9.2 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
40.7 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Likely limited
322 km/h
200 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
7.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
9.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.1 s
11.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
128 mph
223 km/h
139 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
635 hp
474 kW
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
649 hp
484 kW

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 has 14 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 6.0 W12.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 6.0 W12 and Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
820 Nm
605 lb-ft
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
855 Nm
631 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
2,475 kg
5,456 lb
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
1,880 kg
4,145 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
322 km/h
200 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W124.5 s
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V83.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 and Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 6.0 W12: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 and Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 6.0 W12: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
257 hp/t
191 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
612 km
380 mi
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
522 km
324 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
635 hp
474 kW
4.5 s
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
649 hp
484 kW
3.7 s
322 km/h
200 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
Power
635 hp
474 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
Power
649 hp
484 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,021 mm
197.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
Power
635 hp
474 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
Power
649 hp
484 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
4.5 s
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
3.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
257 hp/t
191 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
Power
635 hp
474 kW
649 hp
484 kW
Torque
820 Nm
605 lb-ft
855 Nm
631 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.5 s
3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
322 km/h
200 mph
Lightness
2,475 kg
5,456 lb
1,880 kg
4,145 lb
Fuel consumption
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
13.8 L/100 km
17.0 mpg US
20.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,021 mm
197.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Range score
612 km
380 mi
522 km
324 mi
CO2 score
335 g/km
-
Trunk score
475 L
16.8 cu ft
447 L
15.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
257 hp/t
191 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 6.0 W12Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8
Consumption14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.72 LC100 km24.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.40 LC100 mi38.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,859 LC/year3,623 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 6.0 W12

  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 91 km (56 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 28 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 35 Nm more
  • Is 595 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 89 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Flying Spur II S 6.0 W12
Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 6.0 W12
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12vsBentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
V 6.2 V8
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
S 6.0 W12
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12vsBentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
V 6.2 V8
V 6.0 i V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacCTS IV 6.0 i V8
S 6.0 W12
Speed 6.75 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
V 6.2 V8
SV Project 8 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsJaguarXE (X760)SV Project 8 5.0 V8
S 6.0 W12
Speed 6.0i W12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12vsBentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
V 6.2 V8
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
S 6.0 W12
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12vsBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
V 6.2 V8
4.0 TFSI COD V8 plus
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsAUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8 plus
S 6.0 W12
R 5.0 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
V 6.2 V8
6.0 W12
VS
CadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 S 6.0 W12 vs Cadillac CTS III V 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster