Car comparison

Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8vsBentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015

S 4.0 V8

528 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2019
VS

Bentley Mulsanne EWB

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    306 km/h
    190 mph
  • Most powerful
    528 hp
    394 kW
  • Lightest
    2,417 kg
    5,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    218 hp/t
    163 kW/t
    4.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.9 L/100 km
    14.8 mpg US
    17.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    254 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    826 km
    513 mi
  • Largest trunk
    475 L
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    83/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    71/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
528hp394kW
512hp382kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
1,020Nm752lb-ft
Curb weight
2,417kg5,329lb
2,730kg6,019lb
Gross weight
2,972kg6,552lb
3,200kg7,055lb
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
To 99% top speed
62.6s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
70.4s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
13.6s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.7s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
218hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
826km513mi
Calculated
658km409mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,993cc244cu in
6,752cc412cu in
Length
5,299mm209in
5,825mm229in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,488mm59in
1,541mm61in
Wheelbase
3,066mm121in
3,516mm138in
Front track-
1,605mm63in
Rear track-
1,651mm65in
Trunk volume
475L
446L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
96L
CO2 emissions
254g/km
344g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V86,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V84,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.6 s
15.9 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.7 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
193 km/h
120 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
528 hp
394 kW
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 has 16 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 and Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
2,417 kg
5,329 lb
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
2,730 kg
6,019 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
306 km/h
190 mph
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V84.9 s
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V85.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 3.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
218 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
826 km
513 mi
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
658 km
409 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
528 hp
394 kW
4.9 s
306 km/h
190 mph
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.5 s
296 km/h
184 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
Power
528 hp
394 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,825 mm
229.3 in
Height
1,541 mm
60.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
Power
528 hp
394 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
4.9 s
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
218 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
528 hp
394 kW
512 hp
382 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
5.5 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
296 km/h
184 mph
Lightness
2,417 kg
5,329 lb
2,730 kg
6,019 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,825 mm
229.3 in
Height
1,541 mm
60.7 in
Range score
826 km
513 mi
658 km
409 mi
CO2 score
254 g/km
344 g/km
Trunk score
475 L
16.8 cu ft
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
218 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km25.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi41.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year3,833 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8

  • Has 16 hp more
  • Is 313 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 168 km (104 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 29 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 90 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8

  • Has 340 Nm more

Pros

  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Flying Spur II S 4.0 V8
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
S 4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
S 4.0 V8
S 600 V12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (X222)S 600 V12
6.75 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
S 4.0 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
6.75 V8
F 5.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
V 3.6 V6
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
6.75 V8
S 560 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (X222)Facelift 2017S 560 V8
Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 vs Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster