Bentley Mulsanne EWB
Car comparison
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8vsBentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Arnage T
6.8i V8 Biturbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed296 km/h184 mph
- Most powerful512 hp382 kW
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.8 L/100 km10.3 mpg US12.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions344 g/km
- Best estimated range658 km409 mi
- Largest trunk446 L
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score68/100
Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
- Lightest2,585 kg5,699 lb
- Best power-to-weight196 hp/t146 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score80/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 512hp382kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 1,020Nm752lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,730kg6,019lb | 2,585kg5,699lb |
| Gross weight | 3,200kg7,055lb | 3,065kg6,757lb |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.4s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated | 67.5s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK | 19.5L/100 km12.1mpg US14.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK | 28.8L/100 km8.2mpg US9.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated | 387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | 492km306mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,752cc412cu in | 6,761cc413cu in |
| Length | 5,825mm229in | 5,400mm213in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,541mm61in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 3,516mm138in | 3,116mm123in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,602mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 446L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 374L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 96L |
| CO2 emissions | 344g/km | 465g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 4,200 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.9 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 507 hp 378 kW |
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 has 5 hp more than Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 288 km/h 179 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 5.5 s |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 5.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 and Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo: 4.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 658 km 409 mi |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 492 km 306 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.5 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 507 hp 378 kW | 5.5 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 |
| 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo |
| 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 | BentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 512 hp 382 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 296 km/h 184 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | 492 km 306 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 344 g/km | 465 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 446 L 15.8 cu ft | 374 L 13.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 | Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK | 19.5 L/100 km12.1 mpg US14.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.55 LC100 km | 34.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi | 54.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal | 2,925 L773 US gal643 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,833 LC/year | 5,119 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 165 km (103 mi) more estimated range
- Has 72 L more trunk volume
- Emits 121 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Bentley Arnage T 6.8i V8 Biturbo
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























