Car comparison

Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8vsCadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015

S 4.0 V8

528 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2019
VS

Cadillac ATS Sedan

V 3.6 V6

471 hp3564 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboSedan2016-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    306 km/h
    190 mph
  • Most powerful
    528 hp
    394 kW
  • Highest torque
    680 Nm
    502 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    826 km
    513 mi
  • Largest trunk
    475 L
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    71/100

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,729 kg
    3,812 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    272 hp/t
    203 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
528hp394kW
471hp351kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
603Nm445lb-ft
Curb weight
2,417kg5,329lb
1,729kg3,812lb
Gross weight
2,972kg6,552lb
-
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
298 km/h
185 mph
To 99% top speed
59.5s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
44.7s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
4.2s
0-200 km/h
13.4s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
4.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.7s
Calculated
11.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
218hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
272hp/t203kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
826km513mi
Calculated
488km303mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,993cc244cu in
3,564cc217cu in
Length
5,299mm209in
4,673mm184in
Width-
1,811mm71in
Height
1,488mm59in
1,415mm56in
Wheelbase
3,066mm121in
2,775mm109in
Front track-
1,538mm61in
Rear track-
1,536mm60in
Trunk volume
475L
295L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
90L
61L
CO2 emissions
254g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6PowerTorque
  • Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V86,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V65,850 rpm3,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
4.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
4.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.4 s
11.2 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
298 km/h
185 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
10.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.7 s
11.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
194 km/h
121 mph
207 km/h
129 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
528 hp
394 kW
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 has 57 hp more than Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 and Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8: 57 hp (43 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
603 Nm
445 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
2,417 kg
5,329 lb
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
1,729 kg
3,812 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
306 km/h
190 mph
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
298 km/h
185 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V84.9 s
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V64.2 s

Although Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 has more power, Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 and Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 and Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
218 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
826 km
513 mi
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
488 km
303 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
528 hp
394 kW
4.9 s
306 km/h
190 mph
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
4.2 s
298 km/h
185 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
Power
528 hp
394 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
Power
528 hp
394 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
4.9 s
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
4.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
218 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
528 hp
394 kW
471 hp
351 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
4.2 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
298 km/h
185 mph
Lightness
2,417 kg
5,329 lb
1,729 kg
3,812 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Range score
826 km
513 mi
488 km
303 mi
CO2 score
254 g/km
-
Trunk score
475 L
16.8 cu ft
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
218 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km21.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi34.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year3,255 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8

  • Has 57 hp more
  • Has 77 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 338 km (210 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 180 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

  • Is 688 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Flying Spur II S 4.0 V8
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
V 3.6 V6
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
S 4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
V 3.6 V6
CS 3.0
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsBMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0
S 4.0 V8
Speed 6.75 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
V 3.6 V6
F 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
V 3.6 V6
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
S 4.0 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
V 3.6 V6
AMG C 63 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
S 4.0 V8
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8vsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
V 3.6 V6
S 3.0 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 2017S 3.0 V6
Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 vs Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster