Car comparison

Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8vsBentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015

S 4.0 V8

528 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2019
VS

Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016

Speed 6.75 V8

537 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    306 km/h
    190 mph
  • Lightest
    2,417 kg
    5,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    218 hp/t
    163 kW/t
    4.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    15.9 L/100 km
    14.8 mpg US
    17.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    254 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    826 km
    513 mi
  • Largest trunk
    475 L
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
528hp394kW
537hp400kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
1,100Nm811lb-ft
Curb weight
2,417kg5,329lb
2,685kg5,919lb
Gross weight
2,972kg6,552lb
3,200kg7,055lb
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
To 99% top speed
62.6s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
63.3s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
13.6s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.7s
Calculated
12.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
218hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
410Nm/t274lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
826km513mi
Calculated
658km409mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,993cc244cu in
6,752cc412cu in
Length
5,299mm209in
5,575mm219in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,488mm59in
1,521mm60in
Wheelbase
3,066mm121in
3,266mm129in
Front track-
1,605mm63in
Rear track-
1,651mm65in
Trunk volume
475L
443L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
90L
96L
CO2 emissions
254g/km
342g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V86,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V84,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.6 s
13.7 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.7 s
12.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
193 km/h
120 mph
192 km/h
119 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8 has 9 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
1,100 Nm
811 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
2,417 kg
5,329 lb
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
2,685 kg
5,919 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
306 km/h
190 mph
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
305 km/h
190 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8 has more power, Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8: 3.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
218 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
528 hp
394 kW
4.9 s
306 km/h
190 mph
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
537 hp
400 kW
4.9 s
305 km/h
190 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
Power
528 hp
394 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
537 hp
400 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
Power
528 hp
394 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
537 hp
400 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
4.9 s
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8
218 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
528 hp
394 kW
537 hp
400 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
1,100 Nm
811 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
4.9 s
Top speed
306 km/h
190 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Lightness
2,417 kg
5,329 lb
2,685 kg
5,919 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Range score
826 km
513 mi
658 km
409 mi
CO2 score
254 g/km
342 g/km
Trunk score
475 L
16.8 cu ft
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
218 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km25.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi41.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year3,833 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8

  • Is 268 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 168 km (104 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 32 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 88 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Flying Spur II S 4.0 V8
Bentley Mulsanne II Speed 6.75 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 vs Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster