Cadillac ATS Sedan
Car comparison
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6vsLexus GS IV · Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus GS IV · Facelift 2015
F 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed298 km/h185 mph
- Highest torque603 Nm445 lb-ft
- Lightest1,729 kg3,812 lb
- Best power-to-weight272 hp/t203 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Best performance score84/100
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8
- Most powerful477 hp356 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range589 km366 mi
- Best overall score80/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 471hp351kW | 477hp356kW |
| Torque | 603Nm445lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,729kg3,812lb | 1,865kg4,112lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 44.7s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph Calculated | 45.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 272hp/t203kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 488km303mi Calculated | 589km366mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,564cc217cu in | 4,969cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,673mm184in | 4,915mm194in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,775mm109in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,536mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 295L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 260g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 5,850 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 12.5 s |
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 199 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW |
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 has 6 hp more than Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 and Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 1,729 kg 3,812 lb |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 4.2 s |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
Although Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 has more power, Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 and Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 and Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 488 km 303 mi |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 589 km 366 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW | 4.2 s | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6 | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 471 hp 351 kW | 477 hp 356 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,729 kg 3,812 lb | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 488 km 303 mi | 589 km 366 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 260 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 295 L 10.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 | Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6
- Has 73 Nm more
- Is 136 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8
- Has 6 hp more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























