Lexus GS IV · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Lexus GS IV · Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8vsLexus GS I 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus GS I
300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful477 hp356 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight256 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Lexus GS I 300
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range762 km473 mi
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | LexusGS I300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 477hp356kW | 208hp155kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 275Nm203lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 45.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 87.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 31.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 160Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 589km366mi Calculated | 762km473mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,969cc303cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,915mm194in | 4,965mm195in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,515mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 404L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 260g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Lexus GS I 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
| LexusGS I300 | 5,800 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | LexusGS I300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 31.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 123 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW |
| LexusGS I300 | 208 hp 155 kW |
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 has 269 hp more than Lexus GS I 300.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus GS I 300 and Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8: 269 hp (201 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| LexusGS I300 | 275 Nm 203 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
| LexusGS I300 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| LexusGS I300 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| LexusGS I300 | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 and Lexus GS I 300: 4.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| LexusGS I300 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus GS I 300 and Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| LexusGS I300 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 589 km 366 mi |
| LexusGS I300 | 762 km 473 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| LexusGS I300 | 208 hp 155 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusGS I300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusGS I300 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| LexusGS I300 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| LexusGS I300 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | LexusGS I300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 477 hp 356 kW | 208 hp 155 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 275 Nm 203 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 589 km 366 mi | 762 km 473 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 260 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 | Lexus GS I 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8
- Has 269 hp more
- Has 255 Nm more
- Is 4.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
- Has 135 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lexus GS I 300
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 173 km (107 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























