BMW M3 (F80)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0vsLexus GS IV · Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus GS IV · Facelift 2015
F 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Best power-to-weight290 hp/t216 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions194 g/km
- Best estimated range723 km449 mi
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score85/100
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8
- Most powerful477 hp356 kW
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460hp343kW | 477hp356kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,865kg4,112lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 45.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 379Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 723km449mi Calculated | 589km366mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 4,969cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,915mm194in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 445L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | 260g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
- Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000-5,380 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 12.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 209 km/h 130 mph | 199 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW |
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 has 17 hp more than BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 and Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 3.9 s |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
Although Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 has more power, BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 and Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 and Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 723 km 449 mi |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 589 km 366 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | LexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp 343 kW | 477 hp 356 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 723 km 449 mi | 589 km 366 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | 260 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 | Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 280 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 134 km (83 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 66 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Lexus GS IV Facelift 2015 F 5.0 V8
- Has 17 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























