Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8vsBentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Mulsanne II
6.75 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed306 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful528 hp394 kW
- Lightest2,417 kg5,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight218 hp/t163 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range826 km513 mi
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Highest torque1,020 Nm752 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 528hp394kW | 512hp382kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 1,020Nm752lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,417kg5,329lb | 2,585kg5,699lb |
| Gross weight | 2,972kg6,552lb | 3,090kg6,812lb |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.6s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 66.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.6s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 218hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 826km513mi Calculated | 568km353mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,993cc244cu in | 6,752cc412cu in |
| Length | 5,299mm209in | 5,575mm219in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,488mm59in | 1,521mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 3,066mm121in | 3,266mm129in |
| Front track | - | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,652mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 443L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 96L |
| CO2 emissions | 254g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 4,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.6 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 528 hp 394 kW |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW |
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 has 16 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 and Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 2,417 kg 5,329 lb |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8: 6.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 218 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 826 km 513 mi |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 568 km 353 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 528 hp 394 kW | 4.9 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.3 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | 218 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 4.0 V8 | BentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 528 hp 394 kW | 512 hp 382 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,417 kg 5,329 lb | 2,585 kg 5,699 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 826 km 513 mi | 568 km 353 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 254 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 218 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8 | Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 29.57 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 4,436 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 S 4.0 V8
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 168 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 258 km (160 mi) more estimated range
- Has 32 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Bentley Mulsanne II 6.75 V8
- Has 340 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























