Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest2,016 kg4,445 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions181 g/km
- Best estimated range910 km566 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,016kg4,445lb | 2,078kg4,581lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 888km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,676mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,679mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 368L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 6.5 s |
Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 910 km 566 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 888 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 888 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Is 62 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range
- Has 137 L more trunk volume
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























