Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 35ivsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

35i

306 hp2979 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

320 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 (F16) 35i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,025 kg
    4,464 lb
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    988 km
    614 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Most powerful
    320 hp
    239 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    186 g/km
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)35iVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
306hp228kW
320hp239kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,025kg4,464lb
2,078kg4,581lb
Gross weight
2,740kg6,041lb
2,750kg6,063lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
84.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
84.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
27.1s
Calculated
27.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
988km614mi
Calculated
888km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,950mm195in
Width
1,989mm78in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,676mm66in
Rear track
1,706mm67in
1,679mm66in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
238mm9in
Trunk volume
550L
368L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
71L
CO2 emissions
200g/km
186g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 35iVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 35i: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)35i5,800-6,400 rpm1,200-5,000 rpm6,650 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,200-5,400 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)35iVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.1 s
27.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
157 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
306 hp
228 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
320 hp
239 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has 14 hp more than BMW X6 (F16) 35i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 35i and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
2,025 kg
4,464 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,078 kg
4,581 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
240 km/h
149 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i6.4 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T66.5 s

Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has more power, BMW X6 (F16) 35i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 35i and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and BMW X6 (F16) 35i: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)35i
988 km
614 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
888 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)35i
306 hp
228 kW
6.4 s
240 km/h
149 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
320 hp
239 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)35i
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)35i
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
6.4 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)35i
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)35iVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
320 hp
239 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
6.5 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
2,025 kg
4,464 lb
2,078 kg
4,581 lb
Fuel consumption
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
988 km
614 mi
888 km
551 mi
CO2 score
200 g/km
186 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 35iVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.05 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.22 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,258 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 35i

  • Is 53 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 182 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 35i
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

35i
35i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX6 (E71)35i
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
35i
40i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX6 (G06)40i
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
35i
30d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX6 (G06 LCI)Facelift 202330d
2.0 T6
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
35i
35i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435i
2.0 T6
40d
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsBMWX6 (F16)40d
35i
40d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
35i
35d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)35ivsBMWX3 (F25)35d
2.0 T6
GLS 400
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
BMW X6 (F16) 35i vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster