Volvo XC90 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 B4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,950 kg4,299 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,151kg4,742lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 86.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.5s Calculated | 66.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 877km545mi Calculated | 1,203km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,950mm195in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,673mm66in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 238mm9in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 314L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,886L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 189g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,760 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.5 s | 66.5 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 has 53 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 53 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 7.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 877 km 545 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,151 kg 4,742 lb | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 877 km 545 mi | 1,203 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 189 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
- Has 53 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 201 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 327 km (203 mi) more estimated range
- Has 191 L more trunk volume
- Emits 34 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























