Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 · Stage 3vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 · Stage 2vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 · Stage 1vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 D5 (Stage 2)
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 D5 (Stage 1)
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed272 km/h169 mph
- Most powerful349 hp260 kW
- Highest torque752 Nm555 lb-ft
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Best power-to-weight219 hp/t163 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,500 km932 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 349hp260kW+124 hp | 304hp227kW+79 hp | 270hp201kW+45 hp | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 752Nm555lb-ft+282 Nm | 658Nm485lb-ft+188 Nm | 588Nm433lb-ft+118 Nm | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 48.5s99% target: 269 km/h / 167 mph-12.0 s Calculated | 52.3s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph-8.2 s Calculated | 55.4s99% target: 249 km/h / 155 mph-5.1 s Calculated | 60.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s-1.5 s | 5.3s-1.1 s | 5.7s-0.7 s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.1s-8.5 s Calculated | 16.2s-6.3 s Calculated | 18.4s-4.1 s Calculated | 22.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s-1.4 s Calculated | 5.1s-1.0 s Calculated | 5.5s-0.6 s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s-1.7 s Calculated | 13.3s-1.1 s Calculated | 13.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 471Nm/t315lb-ft/ton Calculated | 413Nm/t276lb-ft/ton Calculated | 368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated | 295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,500km932mi Calculated | 1,500km932mi Calculated | 1,500km932mi Calculated | 1,500km932mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 136mm5in | 136mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 380L | 380L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L | 68L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 304 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 1) 270 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 225 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.1 s | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.3 s | 5.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.1 s | 16.2 s | 18.4 s | 22.5 s |
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.8 s | 9.1 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.3 s | 11.6 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.3 s | 13.7 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 349 hp 260 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 304 hp 227 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 270 hp 201 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | 225 hp 168 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp has 124 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 225 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 225 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp: 124 hp (92 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 752 Nm 555 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 658 Nm 485 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 588 Nm 433 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 4.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 5.3 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 5.7 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 225 hp: 1.5 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 304 hp and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 1) 270 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 1,500 km 932 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 1,500 km 932 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 1,500 km 932 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | 1,500 km 932 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 349 hp 260 kW | 4.9 s | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 304 hp 227 kW | 5.3 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 270 hp 201 kW | 5.7 s | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 3)349 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 2)304 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 (Stage 1)270 hp | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5225 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 349 hp 260 kW | 304 hp 227 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 752 Nm 555 lb-ft | 658 Nm 485 lb-ft | 588 Nm 433 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.3 s | 5.7 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,500 km 932 mi | 1,500 km 932 mi | 1,500 km 932 mi | 1,500 km 932 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 304 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 1) 270 hp | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 225 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 3) 349 hp
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 94 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 (Stage 2) 304 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























