Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

240 hp1999 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2017-2018
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D5

225 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    246 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    143 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Lightest
    1,595 kg
    3,516 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,500 km
    932 mi
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0dVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
240hp179kW
225hp168kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
470Nm347lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,595kg3,516lb
Gross weight-
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
62.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
60.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
21.9s
Calculated
22.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton
Calculated
295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,245km774mi
Calculated
1,500km932mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
540L
380L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
68L
CO2 emissions
139g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D54,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0dVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.9 s
22.5 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
165 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
240 hp
179 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has 15 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
470 Nm
347 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
1,595 kg
3,516 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
246 km/h
153 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d6.5 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D56.4 s

Although Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
143 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,245 km
774 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
1,500 km
932 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
246 km/h
153 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW
6.4 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
6.5 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
143 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0dVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
225 hp
168 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.4 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,245 km
774 mi
1,500 km
932 mi
CO2 score
139 g/km
-
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
143 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0dVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 160 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

  • Is 85 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 255 km (158 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 D5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0 D5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS902.0 D5
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 D5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.0 D5
Veloce 2.2 JTD
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster