Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5vsVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,500 km932 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Lightest1,583 kg3,490 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,583kg3,490lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 68.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.5s Calculated | 27.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,500km932mi Calculated | 1,436km892mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,628mm182in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.5 s | 27.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 has 10 hp more than Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 6.4 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 1,500 km 932 mi |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 1,436 km 892 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | VolvoS60 II2.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,500 km 932 mi | 1,436 km 892 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 | Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 64 km (40 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
- Is 12 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























