Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5vsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D5

225 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

Alfa Romeo Giulia (952)

Veloce 2.2 JTD

210 hp2143 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    225 hp
    168 kW
  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    141 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,500 km
    932 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
Power
225hp168kW
210hp157kW
Torque
470Nm347lb-ft
470Nm347lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
1,535kg3,384lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
60.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
61.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
22.5s
Calculated
24.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,500km932mi
Calculated
1,106km687mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,143cc131cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,643mm183in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,436mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,820mm111in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,625mm64in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
480L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
52L
CO2 emissions-
122g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTDPowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D54,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm5,000 rpm
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD3,750 rpm1,750 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.5 s
24.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
103 mph
162 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
210 hp
157 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 has 15 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
470 Nm
347 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
1,535 kg
3,384 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D56.4 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD6.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
1,500 km
932 mi
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
1,106 km
687 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW
6.4 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
210 hp
157 kW
6.8 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
6.4 s
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
Power
225 hp
168 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Range score
1,500 km
932 mi
1,106 km
687 mi
CO2 score
-
122 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km8.23 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi13.24 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal705 L186 US gal155 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,234 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 394 km (245 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D5
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Veloce 2.2 JTD
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTDvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0 D5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
Veloce 2.2 JTD
E 250
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTDvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS902.0 D5
Veloce 2.2 JTD
C 250d
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTDvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
2.0 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
Veloce 2.2 JTD
1.6 Energy TCe
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTDvsRenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe
2.0 D5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
Veloce 2.2 JTD
2.0
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTDvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
2.0 D5
380TSI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Veloce 2.2 JTD
2.0 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTDvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Veloce 2.2 JTD - car comparison - FastVsFaster