Car comparison

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Phideon

380TSI

224 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2016-present
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D5

225 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Most powerful
    225 hp
    168 kW
  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,595 kg
    3,516 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    141 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,500 km
    932 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenPhideon380TSIVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
224hp167kW
225hp168kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
470Nm347lb-ft
Curb weight
1,815kg4,001lb
1,595kg3,516lb
Gross weight-
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
84.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
60.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
22.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,071km666mi
Calculated
1,500km932mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
5,074mm200in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,489mm59in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
3,009mm118in
2,776mm109in
Front track-
1,588mm63in
Rear track-
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume-
380L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI4,500-6,250 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D54,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenPhideon380TSIVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
22.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
165 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
224 hp
167 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 has 1 hp more than Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
470 Nm
347 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
1,815 kg
4,001 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
1,595 kg
3,516 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI8.1 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D56.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 1.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
1,071 km
666 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
1,500 km
932 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
224 hp
167 kW
8.1 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW
6.4 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,074 mm
199.8 in
Height
1,489 mm
58.6 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.1 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenPhideon380TSIVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
224 hp
167 kW
225 hp
168 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,815 kg
4,001 lb
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,074 mm
199.8 in
Height
1,489 mm
58.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,071 km
666 mi
1,500 km
932 mi
Trunk score
-
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Phideon 380TSIVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI

  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 220 kg lighter
  • Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 429 km (266 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

380TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0 D5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
380TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI
2.0 D5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
380TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS902.0 D5
380TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
380TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VIFacelift 20141.4 TSI
380TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsVolkswagenLavida IIFacelift 20151.4 TSI
2.0 D5
Veloce 2.2 JTD
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
380TSI
2.0
VS
VolkswagenPhideon380TSIvsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster