Volkswagen Phideon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIvsVolkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Passat (B8)
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 63.0s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.5s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 1,065km661mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 5,074mm200in | 4,767mm188in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,489mm59in | 1,456mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,009mm118in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | - | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,568mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 586L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,152L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 143g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 4,500-6,250 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.5 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 224 hp 167 kW |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI has 4 hp more than Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 246 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
Although Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI has more power, Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 1,065 km 661 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 224 hp 167 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | VolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 1,065 km 661 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 143 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 586 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI | Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 km (4 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 2.0 TSI
- Is 385 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























