Volkswagen Phideon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIvsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,735 kg3,825 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.5s Calculated | 28.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 952km592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,074mm200in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,489mm59in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,009mm118in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | - | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,604mm63in |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 4,500-6,250 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.5 s | 28.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 224 hp 167 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 has 16 hp more than Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 8.1 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 952 km 592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 224 hp 167 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPhideon380TSI | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 952 km 592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 119 km (74 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























