Car comparison

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIvsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Phideon

380TSI

224 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2016-present
VS

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

2.0

240 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,071 km
    666 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenPhideon380TSIJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
224hp167kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,815kg4,001lb
1,735kg3,825lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
241 km/h
150 mph
To 99% top speed
84.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
28.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,071km666mi
Calculated
952km592mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
5,074mm200in
5,130mm202in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,899mm75in
Height
1,489mm59in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
3,009mm118in
3,032mm119in
Front track-
1,626mm64in
Rear track-
1,604mm63in
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
80L
CO2 emissions-
199g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSIJaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI4,500-6,250 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.05,500 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenPhideon380TSIJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
28.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
241 km/h
150 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
224 hp
167 kW
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 has 16 hp more than Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
1,815 kg
4,001 lb
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
1,735 kg
3,825 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
241 km/h
150 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI8.1 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.07.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
1,071 km
666 mi
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
952 km
592 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
224 hp
167 kW
8.1 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
241 km/h
150 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,074 mm
199.8 in
Height
1,489 mm
58.6 in
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.1 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenPhideon380TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenPhideon380TSIJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
224 hp
167 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Lightness
1,815 kg
4,001 lb
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,074 mm
199.8 in
Height
1,489 mm
58.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
1,071 km
666 mi
952 km
592 mi
CO2 score
-
199 g/km
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Phideon 380TSIJaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 119 km (74 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0

  • Has 16 hp more
  • Is 80 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI
Jaguar XJ (X351) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Phideon 380TSI vs Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster