Car comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

2.0

240 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D5

225 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,595 kg
    3,516 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    141 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,500 km
    932 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
240hp179kW
225hp168kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
470Nm347lb-ft
Curb weight
1,735kg3,825lb
1,595kg3,516lb
Gross weight-
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
60.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
28.6s
Calculated
22.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
952km592mi
Calculated
1,500km932mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
5,130mm202in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,899mm75in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
3,032mm119in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,626mm64in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume-
380L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
68L
CO2 emissions
199g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.05,500 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D54,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.6 s
22.5 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
165 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 has 15 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
470 Nm
347 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
1,595 kg
3,516 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 3.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
952 km
592 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
1,500 km
932 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW
6.4 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.9 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
225 hp
168 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
6.4 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
952 km
592 mi
1,500 km
932 mi
CO2 score
199 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 140 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 548 km (340 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ (X351) 2.0
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0 vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster