Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 250vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,500 km932 mi
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score95/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 250
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | 2,255kg4,971lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 60.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s Calculated | 22.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 794km493mi Calculated | 1,500km932mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 250: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 22.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 250 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | 6.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 250: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 250: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | 794 km 493 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 1,500 km 932 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 794 km 493 mi | 1,500 km 932 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 250 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 250
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 160 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 706 km (439 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























