Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5vsAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D5

225 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V)

2.0 T

223 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    225 hp
    168 kW
  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,500 km
    932 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    71/100

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,270 kg
    2,800 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    176 hp/t
    131 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    390 L

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
Power
225hp168kW
223hp166kW
Torque
470Nm347lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
1,270kg2,800lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
1,820kg4,012lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
209 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
60.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
44.5s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
22.5s
Calculated
30.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
276Nm/t184lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,500km932mi
Calculated
948km589mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,456mm175in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,796mm71in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,416mm56in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,637mm104in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,555mm61in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,526mm60in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
390L
Max trunk volume-
845L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
55L
CO2 emissions-
135g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
  • AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D54,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm5,000 rpm
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T4,500-6,200 rpm1,600-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.5 s
30.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
209 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
14.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
103 mph
162 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
223 hp
166 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 has 2 hp more than AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
1,270 kg
2,800 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
209 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D56.4 s
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T6.2 s

Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 has more power, AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
1,500 km
932 mi
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
948 km
589 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
225 hp
168 kW
6.4 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
223 hp
166 kW
6.2 s
209 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
Power
223 hp
166 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
209 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,456 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
Power
223 hp
166 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
209 km/h
130 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
6.4 s
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
6.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T
Power
225 hp
168 kW
223 hp
166 kW
Torque
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
1,270 kg
2,800 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,456 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
Range score
1,500 km
932 mi
948 km
589 mi
CO2 score
-
135 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D5

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 552 km (343 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T

  • Is 325 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 10 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D5
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0 T
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
2.0 D5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0 T
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS902.0 D5
2.0 T
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)40 TFSI
2.0 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 T
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TvsAUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
2.0 D5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0 T
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TvsAUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI
2.0 D5
Veloce 2.2 JTD
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D5vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
2.0 T
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D5 vs AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster