AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 Sedan (8V)
2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T
- Most powerful223 hp166 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight176 hp/t131 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions135 g/km
- Best estimated range948 km589 mi
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score70/100
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 223hp166kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,270kg2,800lb |
| Gross weight | 1,915kg4,222lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 44.5s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.2s Calculated | 30.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 276Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 917km570mi Calculated | 948km589mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,241mm167in | 4,456mm175in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,602mm102in | 2,637mm104in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,526mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 325L | 390L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,060L | 845L |
| Doors | 3 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.2 s | 30.3 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 223 hp 166 kW |
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T has 33 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T: 33 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.1 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 6.2 s |
Although AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T has more power, AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 917 km 570 mi |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 948 km 589 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.1 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 223 hp 166 kW | 6.2 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 223 hp 166 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 917 km 570 mi | 948 km 589 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 T
- Has 33 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 32 km (20 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























